Overpaid Employees Held Liable in Court Decisions
Payroll is an important function for both employers and employees alike, and unfortunately, mistakes can happen during the payroll process. When an employee is underpaid, they often are quick to bring it to the employer’s attention. In our experience, though, when the mistake is in the employee’s favor, it often goes unfixed until the employer
Safety Incentive Plans and Post-Incident Drug Testing Get a New Look
A recent Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) memorandum may help employers in finding ways to reduce workplace injuries, workers’ compensation claims, and lost time due to injuries. As outlined in the memorandum, employers will be able to carefully develop and implement safety incentive programs that reward employees for not having any reportable injuries in
Employment Law Letter – Fall 2018
Download: Printable PDF
ADA Accessible Download: Rich Text File
Employment Law Letter is published quarterly as a service to clients and friends by the firm’s Labor and Employment Practice Group.
Included in this issue:
- Medical Marijuana Ruling Favors Employees
- HealthBridge Loses Long Battle with NLRB
- “Perceived Pregnancy” Is a Protected Status
- Waterbury Wins
Public Employee Pensions Can Be Cut For Misconduct
Presumably in response to some well-publicized reports of public employees fired for official misconduct and walking away with generous pension benefits, the Connecticut Legislature passed a decade ago a statute authorizing pension reduction or revocation in such circumstances. Although the law has been utilized in a few situations since then, two recent cases demonstrate that
Look Out for Lemmon: Supreme Court Slated to Rule on Age Bias Case
Does the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the “ADEA”) apply to all public employers regardless of how many employees they have, or does it only apply to public employers with at least 20 employees? This is the question that was argued at the Supreme Court on October 1, 2018 in Mount Lemmon Fire District v.
2018 Labor and Employment Fall Seminar
Medical Marijuana Protections Tested For First Time
For the first time, a court in Connecticut has found an employer liable for discriminating against a medical marijuana user. The decision by a federal judge in Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Company, LLC helps to clear the haze surrounding Connecticut’s Palliative Use of Marijuana Act (“PUMA”). As a refresher, PUMA prohibits employers from refusing
Background Check Requirements Can Cause Problems If Not Followed
Attention to detail makes a big difference when employers are required by law to do specific things. The failure to meet all the requirements of a statute can result in litigation and potentially costly judgments. One statute is particularly detailed and requires absolute attention to detail – the Fair Credit Reporting Act. That law governs
Sexual Harassment Claims and the Federal Judiciary
The confirmation hearing of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has been a focus of the media in recent days. A comment made by Kavanaugh, however, highlights how claims of sexual harassment are being handled within the federal court system.
As you may have heard, Kavanaugh was asked about sexual harassment allegations that had been